← All comparisons
DeepSeek V3.1 vs Qwen 3
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, and capabilities
| Spec | 🧠 DeepSeek V3.1 | 💬 Qwen 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba |
| Category | 🧠 Reasoning | 💬 Text Generation |
| Parameters | 671B | 235B |
| Context Window | 128K tokens | 128K tokens |
| License | 🔓 open | 🔓 open |
| Input Price | $0.27 | N/A |
| Output Price | $1.10 | N/A |
| API Available | ✅ | ✅ |
| Released | Jun 1, 2025 | Apr 29, 2025 |
| Trending Score | 🔥 88 | 🔥 87 |
DeepSeek V3.1 Strengths
- ✓Incredible cost efficiency
- ✓Open weights
- ✓Top-tier math/coding
- ✓MoE architecture
Qwen 3 Strengths
- ✓Hybrid thinking modes
- ✓Strong coding
- ✓Excellent multilingual
- ✓Open weights
About DeepSeek V3.1
671B MoE model with only 37B active parameters. Open-weight, excels at math, coding, and Chinese language tasks.
View full details →About Qwen 3
Alibaba's latest open-weight model family with hybrid thinking modes. Strong across coding, math, and multilingual tasks.
View full details →❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, DeepSeek V3.1 or Qwen 3?
It depends on your use case. DeepSeek V3.1 (DeepSeek) has a trending score of 88, while Qwen 3 (Alibaba) scores 87. DeepSeek V3.1 costs $0.27 per 1M input tokens. Check the comparison table above for detailed specs.
Is DeepSeek V3.1 cheaper than Qwen 3?
See the pricing section above for current rates.
Can I use both DeepSeek V3.1 and Qwen 3?
Yes! Many developers use multiple models for different tasks. You might use one for complex reasoning and another for high-volume, cost-sensitive workloads.