← All comparisons
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Llama 4 Scout
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, and capabilities
| Spec | 💬 Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 💬 Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Category | 💬 Text Generation | 💬 Text Generation |
| Parameters | Undisclosed | 109B |
| Context Window | 200K tokens | 512K tokens |
| License | 🔒 proprietary | 🔓 open |
| Input Price | $3 | N/A |
| Output Price | $15 | N/A |
| API Available | ✅ | ✅ |
| Released | Oct 22, 2024 | Apr 5, 2025 |
| Trending Score | 🔥 85 | 🔥 82 |
Claude 3.5 Sonnet Strengths
- ✓Excellent coding
- ✓Fast responses
- ✓Great at following instructions
- ✓Strong creative writing
Llama 4 Scout Strengths
- ✓Fits on single GPU
- ✓Open weights
- ✓512K context
- ✓Cost-effective deployment
About Claude 3.5 Sonnet
The model that defined a generation. Fast, smart, and incredibly capable across coding, analysis, and creative tasks.
View full details →About Llama 4 Scout
Efficient MoE model with 109B total parameters. Fits on a single H100 GPU while delivering strong performance.
View full details →❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Llama 4 Scout?
It depends on your use case. Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Anthropic) has a trending score of 85, while Llama 4 Scout (Meta) scores 82. Claude 3.5 Sonnet costs $3 per 1M input tokens. Check the comparison table above for detailed specs.
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet cheaper than Llama 4 Scout?
See the pricing section above for current rates.
Can I use both Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Llama 4 Scout?
Yes! Many developers use multiple models for different tasks. You might use one for complex reasoning and another for high-volume, cost-sensitive workloads.