← All comparisons

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Gemma 3

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, and capabilities

Spec💬 Claude 3.5 Sonnet💬 Gemma 3
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Category💬 Text Generation💬 Text Generation
ParametersUndisclosed27B
Context Window200K tokens128K tokens
License🔒 proprietary🔓 open
Input Price$3N/A
Output Price$15N/A
API Available✅❌
ReleasedOct 22, 2024Mar 12, 2025
Trending Score🔥 85🔥 76

Claude 3.5 Sonnet Strengths

  • ✓Excellent coding
  • ✓Fast responses
  • ✓Great at following instructions
  • ✓Strong creative writing

Gemma 3 Strengths

  • ✓Runs on consumer hardware
  • ✓Open weights
  • ✓Strong for its size
  • ✓128K context

About Claude 3.5 Sonnet

The model that defined a generation. Fast, smart, and incredibly capable across coding, analysis, and creative tasks.

View full details →

About Gemma 3

Google's open-weight model family. Small, efficient, and capable — runs on a single GPU or even a laptop.

View full details →

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Gemma 3?

It depends on your use case. Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Anthropic) has a trending score of 85, while Gemma 3 (Google) scores 76. Claude 3.5 Sonnet costs $3 per 1M input tokens. Check the comparison table above for detailed specs.

Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet cheaper than Gemma 3?

See the pricing section above for current rates.

Can I use both Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemma 3?

Yes! Many developers use multiple models for different tasks. You might use one for complex reasoning and another for high-volume, cost-sensitive workloads.