← All comparisons

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, and capabilities

Spec💬 Claude 3.5 Sonnet🌐 Gemini 2.5 Pro
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Category💬 Text Generation🌐 Multimodal
ParametersUndisclosedUndisclosed
Context Window200K tokens1.0M tokens
License🔒 proprietary🔒 proprietary
Input Price$3$1.25
Output Price$15$10
API Available✅✅
ReleasedOct 22, 2024Mar 25, 2025
Trending Score🔥 85🔥 93

Claude 3.5 Sonnet Strengths

  • ✓Excellent coding
  • ✓Fast responses
  • ✓Great at following instructions
  • ✓Strong creative writing

Gemini 2.5 Pro Strengths

  • ✓1M+ token context window
  • ✓Native multimodal
  • ✓Deep research mode
  • ✓Competitive pricing

About Claude 3.5 Sonnet

The model that defined a generation. Fast, smart, and incredibly capable across coding, analysis, and creative tasks.

View full details →

About Gemini 2.5 Pro

Google's most capable model with 1M+ token context, native multimodal understanding, and deep research capabilities.

View full details →

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Gemini 2.5 Pro?

It depends on your use case. Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Anthropic) has a trending score of 85, while Gemini 2.5 Pro (Google) scores 93. Claude 3.5 Sonnet costs $3 per 1M input tokens. Check the comparison table above for detailed specs.

Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet costs $3 input / $15 output per 1M tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.25 input / $10 output.

Can I use both Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Pro?

Yes! Many developers use multiple models for different tasks. You might use one for complex reasoning and another for high-volume, cost-sensitive workloads.